Zion How long it takes

Reading across

The whole timeline, end to end

The register sorted by nothing but length. Read down it once and the shape of a session stops being a surprise.

Zion Market addresses

markz73ffpnbidkldppsj5cjnkfujdsy3rkpi5inqw3ikt4omwsldlqd.onion
zionm3fshzgd5pin3yrc5ueltoykozprcsggrgbl6b3dzbpdtfphv2id.onion

Printed as they were given to this site. Nothing here opens them, so none of this says either string is answering at the moment you read it.

This page exists because the cards are deliberately independent. Each one stands alone, which is right for someone who arrives mid problem, and wrong for someone trying to get a picture of the whole thing. Here they are in one column.

The order is length and nothing else. That produces some odd neighbours. A picture failing to appear sits near a form submission, and a parcel sits near a dispute, because what those pairs share is the shape of the silence rather than the subject.

The run

  1. Seconds

    It finishes while you are still looking at the screen.

  2. Minutes

    You stay at the keyboard and it finishes there.

  3. An evening

    You put the machine down and come back to it the same day.

  4. Days

    Tomorrow is the right time to look, not tonight.

  5. Open-ended

    Nothing in the mechanism sets a ceiling, so no honest band exists.

What the run shows that the cards do not

Three things come out of reading it in order.

The first is that the bands are not evenly spaced. There is a long step between an evening and days, and almost no step at all between the top of the seconds band and the bottom of minutes. That is because the bands are five kinds of mechanism rather than five slices of a ruler. Where the bands come from sets that out.

The second is how early the human beings appear. Everything from the evening band onwards has a person in it somewhere, and once a person is involved the wait stops being about the network at all. Most of the frustration people report about markets of this kind is really frustration about other people's schedules.

The third is that the waits stack. Very few of them happen alone. A deposit is a broadcast, then a settlement, then a poll on the market side, and each of those sits in a different band. Someone watching a balance is inside three waits at once and will usually blame whichever one they have heard of.

Where the risk sits along the run

Along the runWhat tends to go wrong there
Near the startReading a short silence as a failure and acting on it. The cost is usually a duplicate of something, and duplicates in the minutes band are expensive.
In the middleStaying at the screen for something that will not resolve at the screen. The cost is attention rather than money, but it is also where people start hunting for replacement addresses.
Towards the endMissing a deadline you did not know was running. Everything in the days band is at risk of this, and escrow running down is the specific case.
Past the endTreating the absence of an end as a reason to keep waiting. The open-ended band exists to name that, and every card in it gives a condition instead of a duration.

Reading it the other way

If you know how long you have been waiting, the run is the wrong shape. Use the register, which is the same set as a table you can scan by band, or go straight to the band hub that matches your situation and read the cards in it.

If you want the layout of a single card explained before you read any of them, how to read a card is short and covers the six headings.

What this card is not. This run is not a walkthrough and it is not the order things happen to you. It is the register sorted by length, which is a different thing entirely.

Everything on this site